Cooling Tower Zandvliet

Owner
ENGIE Electrabel
Asset
Natural-draught cooling tower, 87.5 m high, 57 m base diameter
Location
Zandvliet, Port of Antwerp, Belgium
Built
2003 to 2004
Engineering
SANACON
Study
2021 to 2022

Background & Challenge

The hyperbolic cooling tower at the Zandvliet power plant operates with treated brackish water in an industrial port environment. Rust stains, cracks and loose concrete on the outer shell raised questions about the actual condition of the structure.

The owner wanted to know the current state of the concrete shell, how damage would evolve, and where to act first, in order to plan maintenance actions and budgets on a well-founded basis.

The Solution by Sanacon

  • Drone inspection and plan of approach: A visual inspection with drone imagery mapped the shell in 27 sectors and 83 bands. Based on this, a fixed measurement grid was defined over orientation and height.

  • On-site investigation at height: Using an aerial work platform and a 250-tonne crane with man basket, concrete cores were drilled at 48 locations. Tests included concrete cover, carbonation depth, chloride profiles, porosity, compressive strength and petrographic analysis.

  • Service life analysis in DIMCOST: The probability of reinforcement depassivation by carbonation and by chlorides was calculated per location and visualised as a heat map of the shell per sector and level, based on fib Bulletin 34.

Key Results & Impact

  • Governing mechanism identified: Carbonation poses no significant risk (probability below 1% at all locations). Chloride ingress from the brackish cooling water is the governing mechanism, with chloride contents above the EN 206 limit up to at least 25 mm deep at most locations.

  • Zoning by height: The highest risk is found at the bottom of the shell and at the throat (smallest diameter). Repair and protection can be concentrated in these zones instead of the entire tower.

  • Cosmetic versus structural: Many visible defects turned out to be surface-related (air voids, formwork leakage) without general reinforcement corrosion. A local alkali-silica reaction was confirmed and flagged for follow-up.

By separating cosmetic surface defects from the real durability risk, DIMCOST gave the owner a heat map of where the shell needs protection first, and a solid basis for maintenance scenarios and budgets.

Your structure next

See what DIMCOST can tell you about your own asset

Share your inspection data or describe your structure. We show you how a service life analysis turns it into a maintenance plan you can budget.